Skip to: Main Content / Navigation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Add This

How to align innovation teams



Article ID:
20140811
Published:
August 2014, page 78
Author:
Kip Creel

Article Abstract

Kip Creel outlines several best practices for assembling, guiding and getting the most from product and service innovation teams.

Editor's note: Kip Creel is the president and founder of StandPoint, a Tucker, Ga., firm. 

Cross-functional teams are essential to product and service innovation. Any time there are people involved, the “fuzzy front end” will remain fuzzy. One of our clients calls this place “a simmering pot of ideas, opportunities, opinions, politics and fear.”

A significant amount of literature exists on what it takes to build a culture of innovation and to keep the team aligned on overall goals and objectives. Little is written about what needs to be done specifically during voice-of-the-customer (VOC) studies and concept generation to enhance team cohesion. From our perspective, the customer’s voice is the glue. His or her voice is the most important one in the room and it is our job to ensure the customer remains heard throughout the process.

In the front-end of innovation (FEI), significant dollars can be spent on understanding customer needs and filling the funnel with product concepts. The project team is under immense pressure to make the best use of these resources. Maintaining team alignment, effectively communicating the insights and opportunities and building team confidence are all vital functions of the team leader.

Over the past decade, we have identified several best practices to help align innovation teams during an assignment. There are many moving pieces and careful consideration is required of the people and the process.

Scope the project correctly

When discussing potential VOC projects, the conversation often starts with learning objectives. While important, they are not the most critical things to know before embarking on an expensive assignment. First and foremost, the project team needs to understand the business imperatives. For example, what is the overall innovation strategy or mandate and how does this project fit? Into which innovation platform does this potential project fall? What is the genesis of the platform and why is it a priority? If the project team has an understanding of the big picture – and what is important to senior management – team alignment is easier to achieve and maintain.

In addition to project parameters, there are two other essential components to establish while scoping a VOC initiative to ensure that everyone stays on the same page: success criteria and evaluation criteria.

Large-scale innovation assignments can be expensive. How will success be measured? How will the team articulate a return on investment to senior management, especially when the output is concepts?

We think innovation teams should be held accountable for delivering a specific number of well-developed product concepts. If 10 is the goal, most teams know what needs to be done to get there.

Further, as ideas and concepts emerge, against what criteria will they be evaluated? These assignments can generate hundreds of ideas. How will the team separate the wheat from the chaff? It is essential that the entire team be aligned on these criteria and that they buy into them at the time the project is being scoped. If they are not, there is a high probability that the team will not reach consensus on which concepts to advance in the pipeline.

Some teams can establish project parameters, success criteria and evaluation criteria with little effort. It is common, however, that some teams need a formal process to cross this important hurdle. That’s where a scoping workshop is warranted.

The workshop is preceded with one-on-one interviews with each team member. This ensures the perspective of each team member is heard. In these interviews, we listen for an understanding of the strategic mandate, business imperatives, priorities and overall learning objectives. Results are compiled and we point out areas of agreement and disagreement.

From there, an in-person meeting is typically recommended. The starting point is a review of what was learned during the interviews. Team discussion and problem-solving are then facilitated to drive consensus on the project parameters, success criteria and evaluation criteria.

The workshop usually takes two to four hours and is an excellent use of time. It ensures that everyone is on the same page and builds excitement and momentum toward next steps. The workshop is also a great way to assess the team’s readiness for a major VOC initiative. If, after the workshop, there is still palpable misalignment or trepidation, the plug can be pulled before significant dollars are spent on focus groups, ethnography, surveys and more.

Never remove the guideposts

An aggressively-timed FEI project usually takes eight weeks from start to finish and it is like stepping on a moving train. Once the project is scoped, there is generally a whirlwind of qualitative research to ascertain customer needs: ethnographies, focus groups and interviews. This can involve visiting multiple markets, oftentimes back-to-back. Things easily start to blur.

After validating needs, the timeline advances to ideation and co-creation. After ideation, teams can get overwhelmed with the volume of ideas generated.

When working with large project teams, the players can change from one phase to the next. This adds to the volatility. We’ve been involved in projects where a new team of people were thrown in midway who had little knowledge of the project scope or understanding of customer needs, requiring a delay in team ideation until everyone got up to speed.

Because of all of the moving pieces, it is critical to keep the constants visible throughout every step of the VOC assignment. The scoping phase yields three constants: project parameters, success criteria and evaluation criteria. Once established, the customers’ needs become the essential glue.

If the team does not buy into customer needs or hasn’t internalized them, then team cohesion will erode once they move into ideation and concept refinement. There are some simple things to keep the team focused on the overall project charter and customer needs. The first is to create a laminated sheet or pocket card, with that information printed on it, and give one to every member of the team. When new members come onto the team, they get a card. Because customers participating in ideation or co-creation need to know this information in advance, they too get a card. Also, each time a meeting is held, a wall poster is visible with the same information.

Visible and constant guideposts throughout the VOC assignment are very important to keep innovation teams aligned. This is especially important during concept generation and concept refinement where the sheer volume of ideas can be overwhelming. A mechanism has to be in place to govern the development of this information, so create a “parking lot” for extraneous concepts. When evaluating ideas, if one falls outside of project parameters or cannot be linked back to a customer need, then it goes into the parking lot.

Make it real

VOC involves actively listening to the feedback and ideas of your customers and ensuring the team has internalized them. Creating ways for the project team to immerse with the customer is the best way to internalize needs and to build team cohesion around solving them.

Somewhere along the way, someone in our industry issued a commandment that stated “During focus groups thou must always observe customers through a glass.” Really? Why? The argument I heard was that the presence of the client in the room could bias the participants. I’ve never really witnessed this and oftentimes the most constructive feedback innovation teams get is when they communicate directly with customers. There is no better way to align a team than to throw them in the middle of a customer feedback session.

Immersion also applies to ethnography. By definition, the marketing research version of ethnography is a combination of observation, interviews and participation. The typical approach is to follow someone around, ask questions and videotape them in-the-moment. The best ethnographies occur when the project team can participate alongside the customer. It’s not workable in all situations but if the opportunity arises, do it.

Granted, it is not feasible to immerse every member of the project team in the manners described above. When the number of customer/project team interactions will be limited, our suggestion is to immerse the right people. A great tactic is to immerse a person (or two) who will become the “needs champion” for the entire project team. Their job is to make sure that customer needs stay front and center at every team meeting. We’ve even created life-size cutouts of consumer personas (organized around needs and value drivers) and given them an actual seat at the table. When discussing issues, it’s common for team members to ask “What would Sally [our fictitious consumer] want?” Perhaps a little corny to some, but it works.

As mentioned before, it is imperative that the entire team is fully aligned on customer needs prior to any ideation or concept refinement. In lieu of a PowerPoint presentation, organize a persona workshop. The goal is to hear what was learned during VOC and internalize it. The outcome is a set of customer personas designed by the team that are organized around customer needs and value drivers. Because they were designed by the team, there is generally significant buy-in.

During ideation and concept refinement, there are unique ways to blend the customer and innovation team. Having that customer in the room can be a tremendous equalizer and keeps the team focused on who (and what) really matters. When doing qualitative research, we always keep our eyes open for the “super participant” – someone who can clearly articulate needs, has good ideas and seems thoroughly engaged in the process. When feasible, that participant is invited to participate in ideation and concept-building. In effect, he or she is the customer representative for the innovation team.

In short, wherever you can make the customer part of the team, do it. It has a profound impact on building and maintaining team alignment.

Pace yourself, smartly

During an innovation assignment, some calculated pacing between specific phases can help maintain momentum and team cohesion.

Most innovation projects follow a similar path: project scoping, understanding/validating customer needs, ideation and concept-building and refinement. As it relates to pacing, there are specific recommendations during and between phases.

Scoping requires careful planning and should be done carefully and deliberately to ensure everyone is on the same page. This step may take several meetings, a formal workshop or other tactics but is the most important step in maintaining team cohesion throughout an innovation assignment.

The phase dedicated to determining customer needs typically takes the most time and usually involves qualitative research to hear and understand those needs. Quantitative research is used to validate their prevalence and priority among the target customer. Once the studies are completed, time is needed for the full team to digest and internalize the learning.

Once customer needs have been internalized, it is critical to move quickly to ideation. If too much time passes, there is a decay effect and teams start second-guessing themselves. Take advantage of the momentum coming out of qualitative and quantitative research. You’ll be amazed at the results.

After ideation, attention turns to organizing and synthesizing raw ideas. Take your time with this. Get feedback from everyone on the team. Before you go into concept-building and refinement, poll your team on the winning “idea buckets” using the same set of evaluation criteria established at the very beginning. Try to establish some priorities on where you want to focus the team’s efforts moving forward.

The most effective concept-building and refinement process is one that is designed to force the team to make trade-offs and collectively agree on which concepts will advance. During refinement workshops, we recommend an iterative process where idea buckets or preliminary concepts are fleshed out by small groups and then presented to a larger group for feedback. This results in the entire team having contributed the development of all concepts. After several iterations, consensus voting is then conducted to determine which concepts to advance.

If actual customers are involved in this process, they always get veto power. This prevents good ideas (from the customer’s perspective) from dropping off if they fail to win the popular vote.

Once the concept-building and refinement process is completed, we recommend rapid development of the final concepts. Staffing an illustrator or designer in this phase can accelerate the process.
When the final concepts are finished, hold a team meeting to get their blessing on the concepts and submit them to quantitative testing as quickly as possible. Again, too much stalling (unless there is a really good reason) will erode team cohesion and momentum.

Use the brains in the room

When working with large innovation teams, you often wind up with very diverse personalities and skill sets. Not to be too stereotypical, but think about the people in marketing vs. research and development. A lot of naturally creative people are drawn to the marketing field. Those with strong problem-solving skills often find their way to research and development. Each, however, makes a unique contribution to the innovation function.

An innovation assignment requires a very diverse talent pool and its overall success depends on the right combination of people and process. Team alignment can be compromised when the wrong people are called upon at the wrong step in the process and when the process does not account for the differences in people.

Earlier I mentioned an important role of the needs champion. Did you know that there is a personality type that is hardwired to sense and internalize customer needs? It’s true. In Myers-Briggs testing, that person would be labeled an SF, which stands for Sensing/Feeling and is the middle two letters of the four-letter score resulting from the test. We typically refer to them as storytellers.

Another style, the organizer (ST – Sensing/Thinking) is very process-driven and is the perfect choice to be the person keeping the internal team corralled and on-task.

During ideation, we want to make sure that each small group has at least one creative (NF – Intuition/Feeling) and one problem solver (NT – Intuition/Thinking). These two styles excel at generating original ideas and their presence will actually help those in the group who find brainstorming more difficult.

During concept-building and refinement, the problem solvers are at their best. This process requires a lot of small-group work and, when possible, you want the problem solver to lead the breakout session. He or she is excellent at synthesizing ideas and will help bring others along.

At the beginning of an innovation assignment, we recommend cognitive profiling of your project team. This gives the project owner insight on how best to leverage each team member throughout the process. We always make sure that each person knows his or her style and that the full team understands how the styles work best together. When team assignments are based on leveraging unique gifts and abilities vs. things like tenure and position, it goes a long way in building team cohesion.

Styles testing also encourages self-reflection. When you make someone aware of their natural impulses, they are more likely to keep those in check. The organizer, for example, can find ideation very frustrating because at times it seems like just a lot of spaghetti being thrown at the wall. Well, it is supposed to feel that way. If the organizer knows why they feel the way they do, they are more likely to let it go than disrupt the flow.

The best workshops and team meetings are designed to accommodate and maximize every style in the room. Activities can be designed that activate the left and right sides of the brain and tap into the potential of each style. If everyone feels connected to the process and that it accommodates their individual needs, this too, helps to boost team cohesion.

The best glue

Building and/or maintaining team cohesion is an important aspect of an innovation assignment. Keeping a team focused on customer needs is, without question, the best glue. Take the time to properly scope the project. Establish clear guideposts and make sure everyone knows the boundaries from the beginning. Keep these guideposts visible throughout the assignment. And, always look for opportunities to maximize the engagement and productivity of the innovation team and customer. Everyone has unique gifts and abilities and careful consideration is required to ensure that these gifts are being maximized to their fullest extent.

 

Comment on this article

comments powered by Disqus

Related Glossary Terms

Search for more...

Related Events

RIVA COURSE 201: FUNDAMENTALS OF MODERATING
January 14 - 16, 2015
RIVA Training Institute will hold a course, themed 'Fundamentals of Moderating,' on January 14 - 16 in Rockville, Md.
RIVA COURSE 201: FUNDAMENTALS OF MODERATING
January 26-28, 2014
RIVA Training Institute will hold a course, themed 'Fundamentals of Moderating,' on January 26-28 in Rockville, Md.

View more Related Events...

Related Articles

There are 2541 articles in our archive related to this topic. Below are 5 selected at random and available to all users of the site.

Study looks at what drives first-time car buyers
First-time car buyers are hard to entice but can provide a valuable source of ongoing sales. The article summarizes results from a Polk study that explored the various factors that motivate these consumers.
Testing product names
Name function tests aren’t really about names but the effect of the name on the consumer’s expectations of the product. This article—an excerpt from a chapter in the book Making Names—discusses using adjectival analysis to compare consumers’ expectations of a product with one name versus expectations of the same product with another name.
How neuroscience and MR helped Bausch & Lomb develop and refine critical sales materials
A case study on the testing of detail aids for a new Bausch & Lomb contact lens shows how to effectively meld neuroscience with marketing research.
How to make an in-store connection with Hispanic shoppers
The author provides tips for marketers looking to make an in-store connection with Hispanic shoppers, taking into account the acculturation gap.
Data privacy and social media: a look at attitudes by demographics
The author provides an overview of some of the key debates about data privacy in marketing research and addresses findings from three uSamp studies on privacy concerns.

See more articles on this topic

Related Suppliers: Research Companies from the SourceBook

Click on a category below to see firms that specialize in the following areas of research and/or industries

Specialties

Industries

Conduct a detailed search of the entire Researcher SourceBook directory

Related Discussion Topics

TURF excel-based simulator
12/16/2014 by Joseph O. Fayese
Hi Giovanni
10/17/2014 by Dohyun Kim
request
06/06/2014 by Monika Kunkowska
TURF excel-based simulator
04/17/2014 by Giovanni Olivieri
XLSTAT Turf
04/10/2014 by Felix Schaefer

View More