Skip to: Main Content / Navigation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Add This

The trouble with convenience sampling



Article ID:
20130526-3
Published:
May 2013
Author:
Noel Roos

Article Abstract

Customer feedback is often emotionally-charged. The author reminds researchers that relying on non-representative data in favor of convenient data from established customers can lead to expensive mistakes and poor decision-making.

Editor's note: Noel Roos is vice president at Diedrich RPM, a Burnsville, Minn., research company. She can be reached at 320-760-8223 or at noel@diedrichrpm.com. Roos is located in Burnsville and Alexandria, Minn. This article appeared in the May 20, 2013, edition of Quirk's e-newsletter.     

 

Recently, a student completing his master's degree called to ask a question regarding convenience versus random sampling - and the perils of making decisions based purely on a convenience sample. 

 

"Is it poor business to make decisions on convenience data?" asked the student.


To the great frustration of the student, I said, "It depends."

  

Many companies today have continuous feedback surveys - and it's a good practice, especially if there is an incentive and a company can capture those who are not motivated by extreme happiness or anger. But the bottom line is that while continuous feedback surveys can reveal trends, companies should compare these results with a random sample before making expensive product, service or resource decisions.

  

For example, a retail company routinely gathers a convenience sample of its shoppers via a link on its Web site. Why does a shopper look for and click on this link? Usually because they are motivated by a particular emotion. This same company finds that the convenience sample reveals that it needs to offer lower prices on a certain product or risk losing customers. Should the company react and lower its prices (and possibly product quality to maintain an acceptable profitability level)?

  

No.

  

At least not yet. This trend warrants further research before changes and a new price/value strategy are created. We would recommend this retailer take the feedback seriously but caution that it's possible that only the emotionally-motivated have filled out the survey, missing the bulk of its shoppers.

  

A survey based on a random sample should be implemented to understand the true impact of price (and possibly quality) to understand if there is an issue. A change in price strategy before understanding how the full shopping population feels could result in keeping the small segment who complained while leaving money on the table from customers who did not complain - or worse yet, losing the rest of the population because the price/value equation was altered.

  

The squeaky wheel has many channels to voice displeasure in today's world - including social media, e-mail and yes, feedback surveys. Meanwhile, the happily satisfied keep quietly moving along. Given how loud the world can be, it's more important than ever to get the full picture through sound research practices before making expensive decisions that could negatively impact the bottom line.

Comment on this article

comments powered by Disqus

Related Glossary Terms

Search for more...

Related Events

RIVA COURSE 195: PRINCIPLES OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
March 9, 2015
RIVA Training Institute will hold a course, themed 'Principles of Qualitative Research,' on March 9 in Rockville, Md.
MARKET RESEARCH IN THE MOBILE WORLD ASIA-PACIFIC
March 10-12, 2015
The Merlien Institute will hold a conference, themed 'Market Research in the Mobile World - Asia-Pacific,' on March 10-12 in Singapore.

View more Related Events...

Related Articles

There are 1088 articles in our archive related to this topic. Below are 5 selected at random and available to all users of the site.

Qualitatively Speaking: The value of second sight in qualitative and ethnographic fieldwork
This article cites several examples of how another researcher’s viewing of video from ethnographic or focus group fieldwork can uncover previously overlooked insights.
Validating overnight sampling with an online research panel
Some researchers have wondered if the rapid pace at which online surveys can be completed has introduced some of the same problems associated with overnight phone studies. The authors argue for the use of replicate sampling, which divides the sample frame into mini-samples, which researchers work one at a time to prevent a certain type of consumer from being disproportionately represented in the final data set.
By the Numbers: Survey routers? Approach with caution
The misuse of survey routers threatens to negate any benefits they might have to offer. This article argues that end-clients, vendors and industry bodies must work together to develop guidelines for their responsible application.
Why there's no replacement for face-to-face research
The author shares several stories from the recent past to support her argument that there is no true online equivalent for face-to-face qualitative research.
Data Use: Q-Factors or K-Means? A market segmentation dilemma
In a constantly changing marketplace, marketers must focus on subgroups, tailoring their product and message to achieve their goals. Demographics often aren't enough, consumer attitudes and perceptions must be understood to gain a competitive edge.

See more articles on this topic

Related Suppliers: Research Companies from the SourceBook

Click on a category below to see firms that specialize in the following areas of research and/or industries

Specialties

Conduct a detailed search of the entire Researcher SourceBook directory

Related Discussion Topics

Market research report
08/20/2013 by Aarkstore Store
Most commonly used research techniques
07/28/2010 by Curtis J. Fedder
yes, I have experience with those ethics issues
06/23/2010 by Michael R. Hollon
Ethics
06/11/2010 by Jim Santilli
Research and analysis to foresight your business perspective
02/19/2010 by Emmanuel M. Mendy

View More