Skip to: Main Content / Navigation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Add This

Trade Talk: Label us skeptical of food label claims



Article ID:
20140702
Published:
July 2014
Author:
Joseph Rydholm, Quirk's Editor

Article Abstract

Quirk's Editor Joseph Rydholm looks to food label, discussing what terms and claims consumers find helpful (or unhelpful) when buying food.

Like most consumers, I tend to take food companies’ claims about the health benefits or wholesomeness of their products with, if you’ll pardon the pun, a grain of salt. Sure, if it says “all natural” or “100% juice” my interest will be piqued but I always flip to the list of ingredients to see what’s going on there.

Even that’s no guarantee, though, as cases like the Pom vs. Minute Maid battle have shown. In that fracas, pomegranate juice kings Pom sued Minute Maid over the actual pomegranate-ness of Minute Maid’s Pomegranate Blueberry Flavored Blend. Turns out the beverage is 99.4 percent apple and grape juice, 0.3 percent pomegranate juice, 0.2 percent blueberry juice, and 0.1 percent raspberry juice – all of which is permissible under FDA regulations.

When it comes to food labeling, what do consumers feel are some of the helpful and unhelpful terms? A February Harris Poll found that 73 percent of Americans see packages proclaiming their contents to be “fresh” as helpful in guiding them towards healthy choices. Fresh is at least a term about which there can be little confusion: only products which have never been frozen or warmed and which contain no preservatives can qualify for such a claim.

The following claims, which also have to meet strict criteria in order to qualify to be described as they are, were viewed as helpful by large percentages of respondents:

• high in/good source of (e.g., high in fiber, good source of calcium) – 73 percent;
• low (e.g., low sodium, low cholesterol) – 71 percent;
• free (e.g., fat free, cholesterol free) – 68 percent;
• lean – 65 percent.

As reported in the Harris Poll press materials, Americans are more divided on whether seeing “healthy” on a food package is a helpful indicator that nutrition lies within, with 53 percent feeling it’s helpful and 47 percent indicating it’s not. In fact, this claim is strictly regulated across a broad nutritional spectrum, with specific limits on fat, saturated fat, cholesterol and sodium content; products displaying this claim also need to have at least 10 percent of the recommended daily value for a range of nutrients.

There’s a lot more latitude for food makers with statements like “made with” – as in, “made with whole grains” or “made with real fruit.” These labels can be applied to anything that contains even very small amounts of the boasted content. Roughly three-fourths of U.S. adults (76 percent) feel that these types of statements are helpful in navigating their way to a healthy meal.

Majorities also find packages advertising their contents as natural, all natural or 100 percent natural (62 percent) and lightly sweetened or low sugar (60 percent) to be helpful. However, the FDA has never established an official definition for natural claims. Lightly sweetened and low sugar are similarly undefined, with the low sugar claim in particular sometimes drawing attention away from sweetening accomplished via other products.

Americans show mixed attitudes toward two labels which are helpful – to a point: a majority (57 percent) feel a “reduced” claim – such as “reduced calories” or “reduced fat” – is an indicator of a nutritious product, while fewer than half (45 percent) put the same stock in claims of “light” or “lite.” These claims are in fact both strictly regulated by the FDA, with guidelines requiring they be specific percentages lower than comparable “regular” products in fat, calories or other criteria. This does not necessarily mean the products are low in these factors though.

When asked to select the most important consideration when deciding between food products at the grocery store, 49 percent of Americans point to cost. Cost is in this case followed distantly by combined (29 percent) mentions of fat (8 percent), caloric (8 percent), sodium (8 percent) and sugar (5 percent) content.

Comment on this article

comments powered by Disqus

Related Glossary Terms

Search for more...

Related Events

The Quirk"s Event
February 23-24, 2015
The Quirk’s Event is a two-day experience that flips the traditional conference model and centers around the exhibit hall. In Brooklyn, February 23-24.
FUSE 2015: BRAND STRATEGY & DESIGN
April 13-15, 2015
IIR will hold the annual FUSE conference on April 13-15 at in Chicago.

Related Articles

There are 675 articles in our archive related to this topic. Below are 5 selected at random and available to all users of the site.

Regaining a foothold
Spreckels Sugar Company conducted one-on-one interviews with a cross-section of both light and heavy users of sugar to delve into their attitudes and behavior towards sugar. It then developed product concepts based on this input and tested them in a second round of one-on-ones. Mock-ups of new packaging concepts were then subjected to in-home use tests. During test-marketing, survey cards were distributed to get reactions from consumers in the marketplace.
MR, it’s time to create stories that inspire action
Thania Farrar provides tips for using storytelling when presenting market research deliverables to inspire action.
Mobile sample size: How much is enough?
Analysis of mobile consumer research uncovers what using a smaller sample size means to a study's statistical significance.
The fine points of feelings: Why discrete emotions matter and how to reveal them
Much emotional assessment in consumer research focuses on emotionality in general as opposed to specific emotions and feelings. Distinguishing and marketing toward the specific nature of positive or negative feelings that drive buying decisions can improve executions. This article provides evidence that makes this point and offers suggestions for revealing the specific emotional profiles of products and services.
Qualitatively Speaking: Team moderating: a tonic for tough times
Using multiple moderators, with their respective skill sets and areas of ex-pertise, can bring fresh insights to the qualitative process and help marketers understand consumers’ changing needs and habits.

See more articles on this topic

Related Suppliers: Research Companies from the SourceBook

Click on a category below to see firms that specialize in the following areas of research and/or industries

Industries

Conduct a detailed search of the entire Researcher SourceBook directory

Related Discussion Topics

Indexing GAP
07/26/2011 by Felipe B. Fehse
Fulfillment House Options for In-home
11/16/2010 by Gus A. Valen
role of generational cohort analysis in understanding purchasing behavior
09/14/2009 by Ian L. Straus
Me Too
09/01/2009 by William Bailey
role of generational cohort analysis in understanding purchasing behavior
08/29/2009 by Gul na Ahmad

View More