Content Type:

Glossary

Share Print

Interrater reliability Definition

The extent to which two different researchers obtain the same result when using the same instrument to measure a concept.

Interrater reliability refers to the degree of agreement or consistency between two or more evaluators or raters when assessing the same phenomenon, data set or qualitative input. It ensures that subjective judgments are dependable and replicable.

What are the key aspects of interrater reliability as in marketing research?

• Applies to qualitative coding, content analysis or behavioral observation.
• Measured using statistical methods such as Cohen’s Kappa or Intraclass Correlation.
• Requires clear coding schemes or evaluation criteria.
• Higher reliability indicates greater consistency across raters.
• Training and calibration of raters improve reliability.

Why is interrater reliability important in market research?

It validates the trustworthiness of findings based on human judgment, ensuring that insights drawn from qualitative or observational data are not biased or inconsistent. This enhances the credibility of the research.

Who relies on interrater reliability in the marketing research industry?

• Qualitative researchers.
• Content analysts.
• UX and usability testing teams.
• Ethnographers and field observers.
• Academic and social science researchers.

How do market researchers use interrater reliability?

Researchers use interrater reliability to evaluate how consistently multiple analysts code themes, rate participant behaviors or interpret responses. They use the results to refine coding guides, improve training and ensure reliable interpretation of qualitative data.