Content Type:

Glossary

Share Print

Wilder effect Definition

A form of social desirability bias in which American voters tell pollsters that they are undecided or likely to vote for a black candidate but on election day vote for his/her white opponent instead. more commonly known as the Bradley effect.

The Wilder effect, also known as the Bradley effect, is a form of social desirability bias observed in survey and polling data. It describes a situation in which respondents claim they will support a candidate from a marginalized group – particularly a Black candidate – in an attempt to appear unbiased or progressive, but then vote differently in private. This discrepancy often results in polling data that inaccurately predicts actual outcomes, particularly in politically or socially sensitive contexts.

The term originated from political races in the United States, notably the 1989 Virginia gubernatorial race involving Douglas Wilder. Despite leading in the polls, Wilder won by a much smaller margin than anticipated, prompting researchers to explore the gap between stated intentions and actual voter behavior.

Who needs to understand the Wilder effect in research?

• Political pollsters analyzing voter sentiment in racially or culturally sensitive elections.
• Market researchers designing studies involving social values, identity or inclusion.
• Behavioral scientists studying respondent honesty or implicit bias.
• DEI-focused organizations evaluating attitudes toward race, gender or identity topics.
• Media and public opinion analysts interpreting public perception versus private behavior.

Why does the Wilder effect matter in market research?

If you're involved in survey design, opinion polling or behavioral research, understanding the Wilder effect is crucial to ensuring data integrity. This phenomenon reminds researchers that respondents don’t always reveal their true beliefs – especially when social pressure or fear of judgment is involved. Recognizing the potential for misrepresentation allows researchers to design more nuanced instruments and interpret results with greater care.

Failing to account for the Wilder effect can result in misleading conclusions, flawed forecasts and ineffective strategies, especially in studies touching on race, identity or inclusion.

What makes the wilder effect important to consider?

• It reveals the limits of self-reported data – especially in socially sensitive contexts.
• It underscores the need for methodological safeguards, such as indirect questioning or anonymous data collection.
• It challenges researchers to go beyond surface responses, prompting deeper analysis and validation methods.
•  It highlights the societal pressures influencing research participants, offering insight into human behavior beyond statistics.