Skip to: Main Content / Navigation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Add This

5 steps to set your MR project up for success



Article ID:
20131225-3
Published:
December 2013
Author:
Frank Pleticha

Article Abstract

Laying out a five-step process for research design, this article details the questions practitioners should ask themselves before beginning a project to help ensure that it is successful.

Editor's note: Frank Pleticha is lead consultant at answers2action LLC, a Brooklyn Center, Minn., research company. He can be reached at frankpleticha@gmail.com. This article appeared in the December 9, 2013, edition of Quirk's e-newsletter.

The garbage in, garbage out principle has never been so true as when it's applied to the design of marketing research. Too often, researchers begin a project with a list of survey questions or a technique in mind. The outcome is typically a long, cumbersome survey instrument, leading to data with little actionability. Worse, the researchers have positioned themselves as techies and not as true, value-added consultants to the marketing decision maker.
 
Here's how to avoid that failure scenario. This five-step research design process has worked successfully for me over the course of a couple hundred research projects.
 
First, ground yourself in the type of marketing decision the company needs to make. Strategic or tactical? Are you exploring new territory or trying to explain something you're already seeing in the marketplace?
 
Secondly, ask yourself: What's at stake here? What's the cost of a wrong decision? If you think of research as a risk-management tool, how large does the research-driven "insurance policy" need to be? If the cost of a wrong marketing decision is only $10,000, you wouldn't want to propose a $50,000 marketing research study to guard against this (relatively) small mistake.  Conversely, if the cost of a wrong decision runs in the millions, then a $50,000 - or even a $100,000 - research study might be appropriate.
 
Third, given what you've learned from steps one and two, ask the decision makers to identify what they really need to know. What data will inform the marketing decision and what is just nice-to-know?
 
Fourth, how, specifically, are you going to use these insights once obtained? I've found it's helpful at this early stage to invent a hypothetical answer and run it past the decision maker as a type of sanity check. For example, if you learn that 62 percent of this market segment doesn't shop online, how will knowing that impact your business decision? If you can't link a potential finding to some type of action, consider dropping that question from the survey.
 
Fifth and finally, what, if anything, do you already know about these issues from secondary sources? Perhaps 25 percent of the answers already exist and you don't need to develop survey questions in a primary research project to reconfirm what's already known.

Valuable partners

It's only after I have answers to these five questions that I start to think about the research technique and the data collection instrument. Using this five-step research design process places the cart behind the horse and helps to ensure that you're seen as a valuable contributing partner to senior-level decision makers.

Comment on this article

comments powered by Disqus

Related Glossary Terms

Search for more...

Related Events

ESOMAR ANNUAL CONGRESS 2014
September 7-10, 2014
ESOMAR will hold its annual congress on September 7-10 in Nice, France.
RIVA COURSE 202: SKILL ACCELERATION
September 8-10, 2014
RIVA Training Institute will hold a course, themed 'Skill Acceleration' on September 8-10 in Rockville, Md.

View more Related Events...

Related Articles

There are 867 articles in our archive related to this topic. Below are 5 selected at random and available to all users of the site.

Managing the impact of personnel on international research projects
How to manage the effects of personnel changes and other research company-based factors on an international research project.
Ignoring research findings can be very costly
Sales and marketing personnel tend to be positive types who look for the good things about the products and services they sell while minimizing shortcomings of those same products and services. These traits are necessary if they are to be successful in their jobs. This article provides a case history that illustrates how a client’s internal factors can thwart the results of valid research.
Surveying focus group respondents yields unexpected benefits
A three-phase study, reported on in other issues of Quirk’s, involved asking focus group participants to complete a questionnaire asking why they participate in focus groups. Previous issues of Quirk’s have reported on the results of all three phases of the study. This article focuses on how the consultants distributing the questionnaires in Phase III felt about doing the research, including the usefulness of this type of surveying, their observations about participant reactions to the questionnaires, and reactions to sharing the results with field personnel.
What (not) to do this research conference season
Based on Colleen A. Rickenbacher's books Be on Your Best Business Behavior and Be on Your Best Cultural Behavior, here are a few guidelines to follow to improve your experience at trade shows and conferences.
Trade Talk: Cheap PCs: Is the revolution finally here?
An overview of the current and future state of the PC industry.

See more articles on this topic

Related Discussion Topics

Market research report
08/20/2013 by Aarkstore Store
Most commonly used research techniques
07/28/2010 by Curtis J. Fedder
yes, I have experience with those ethics issues
06/23/2010 by Michael R. Hollon
Ethics
06/11/2010 by Jim Santilli
Research and analysis to foresight your business perspective
02/19/2010 by Emmanuel M. Mendy

View More