Skip to: Main Content / Navigation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Add This

5 steps to set your MR project up for success



Article ID:
20131225-3
Published:
December 2013
Author:
Frank Pleticha

Article Abstract

Laying out a five-step process for research design, this article details the questions practitioners should ask themselves before beginning a project to help ensure that it is successful.

Editor's note: Frank Pleticha is lead consultant at answers2action LLC, a Brooklyn Center, Minn., research company. He can be reached at frankpleticha@gmail.com. This article appeared in the December 9, 2013, edition of Quirk's e-newsletter.

The garbage in, garbage out principle has never been so true as when it's applied to the design of marketing research. Too often, researchers begin a project with a list of survey questions or a technique in mind. The outcome is typically a long, cumbersome survey instrument, leading to data with little actionability. Worse, the researchers have positioned themselves as techies and not as true, value-added consultants to the marketing decision maker.
 
Here's how to avoid that failure scenario. This five-step research design process has worked successfully for me over the course of a couple hundred research projects.
 
First, ground yourself in the type of marketing decision the company needs to make. Strategic or tactical? Are you exploring new territory or trying to explain something you're already seeing in the marketplace?
 
Secondly, ask yourself: What's at stake here? What's the cost of a wrong decision? If you think of research as a risk-management tool, how large does the research-driven "insurance policy" need to be? If the cost of a wrong marketing decision is only $10,000, you wouldn't want to propose a $50,000 marketing research study to guard against this (relatively) small mistake.  Conversely, if the cost of a wrong decision runs in the millions, then a $50,000 - or even a $100,000 - research study might be appropriate.
 
Third, given what you've learned from steps one and two, ask the decision makers to identify what they really need to know. What data will inform the marketing decision and what is just nice-to-know?
 
Fourth, how, specifically, are you going to use these insights once obtained? I've found it's helpful at this early stage to invent a hypothetical answer and run it past the decision maker as a type of sanity check. For example, if you learn that 62 percent of this market segment doesn't shop online, how will knowing that impact your business decision? If you can't link a potential finding to some type of action, consider dropping that question from the survey.
 
Fifth and finally, what, if anything, do you already know about these issues from secondary sources? Perhaps 25 percent of the answers already exist and you don't need to develop survey questions in a primary research project to reconfirm what's already known.

Valuable partners

It's only after I have answers to these five questions that I start to think about the research technique and the data collection instrument. Using this five-step research design process places the cart behind the horse and helps to ensure that you're seen as a valuable contributing partner to senior-level decision makers.

Comment on this article

comments powered by Disqus

Related Glossary Terms

Search for more...

Related Events

AMA 2015 MARKETING AND PUBLIC POLICY CONFERENCE
June 4-6, 2015
The AMA will hold its 2014 Marketing and Public Policy Conference on June 4-6 in Washington, D.C.
FROM PRACTITIONERS TO THE C-SUITE: WHO REALLY INFLUENCES B2B PURCHASES?
June 10 at 1:00 pm CDT, 2015
Illuminas will be sponsoring a one hour Webinar titled, ‘From practitioners to the C-suite: Who really influences B2B purchases?’ on June 10 at 1 p.m. CDT.

View more Related Events...

Related Articles

There are 966 articles in our archive related to this topic. Below are 5 selected at random and available to all users of the site.

Want better laddering results? Add technology and teamwork.
The author details her techniques for overcoming common barriers to the laddering process.
Research company puts software to the test
In the 1970s, Marketing Research Institute (MRI) wrote its own software. When the company upgraded its computers in 1982, MRI found a need for an interfacing software package. MRI chose StatPac for its analytical capabilities and ease of use. Today, the company’s success with large-scale projects relies on its software.
How one research firm adapted to the Internet
For almost three years, MSW Group has been actively experimenting with the use of the Internet for its communication research services. This article details MSW’s experience.
Make sure your product innovations serve consumer interests, not corporate ones
For companies in search of innovation help, the author provides several hard-won tips, including: make sure your innovations fit your brand’s strategy; identify specific and compelling consumer problems to solve, not just mere annoyances; get everyone actively involved in the process – watch how consumers live with and use existing products.
A look at the state of business-to-business research
The authors draw from a study of business-to-business research to examine the prevalence of B2B research and which techniques and methods are preferred.

See more articles on this topic

Related Discussion Topics

Most commonly used research techniques
07/28/2010 by Curtis J. Fedder
yes, I have experience with those ethics issues
06/23/2010 by Michael R. Hollon
Ethics
06/11/2010 by Jim Santilli
Research and analysis to foresight your business perspective
02/19/2010 by Emmanuel M. Mendy
Behind The Curtain
10/26/2009 by Alastair Gordon

View More